Abortion may be the greatest moral tragedy of our time. Yet abortion is not an ideological issue - it is a moral issue. A libertarian and socialist could both be opposed to abortion, while at the same time be bitterly opposed in all other aspects of political philosophy. If a litmus test requiring candidates to be pro-life is required, conservatives may not be able to win enough elections to implement an ideological conservative agenda. To win elections, conservatives may need to capture votes from social liberals and independents. In some circles this may require pro-abortion candidates. Requiring a litmus test could postpone forever the implementation of other conservative policies.

Further, a litmus test could prevent future policy limitations on abortion by helping to elect social liberals who will appoint liberal judges. Electorates and constituents are not immune to persuasion. A young constituent is far more likely to be shown the light of the pro-life movement through a government and society run by pro-abortion conservatives than through a government and society run by pro-abortion liberals.

on the other hand, abortion is the greatest moral tragedy of our time. If we are ever to put a stop to abortion, conservatives must have principled convictions and must be consistent in these positions. Pro-abortion is the lazy and default position of human vice. Allowing pro-abortion politicians and judges to populate the conservative ranks could cause the conservative movement to become lazy. This laziness could lead to the pro-life position drifting out of the mainstream just as other traditional social issues have fallen in the past.

The chairman, who may prefer the global test to the litmus test, has called for a debate to settle the question:

Resolved: Abortion should not be a litmus test

The Debate will be held on Wednesday, October 20, 2004 at the University Club, 420 Summit Avenue, in Saint Paul. The Chancellor will preside over drinks beginning at seven o'clock p.m. The debate will begin at half past seven. While there is no dress code for attendance, gentlemen who wish to speak must wear a tie; ladies should adhere to a similar sartorial standard. For those gentlemen who arrive tieless yet wish to speak, fret not: the Purveyor of Ties will keep on hand at least one of his quite remarkable ties for just such an eventuality. Questions about debate caucus procedures or about the John Adams Society itself may be directed to the Chairman at 952-985-7776 or the Secretary at (952) 937-7630.

If you would like to receive email announcements of upcoming debates, email the John Adams Society with your name, email address, and a simple statement requesting future "Whip Sheets" via email.