The Electoral College violates the most fundamental principal of democracy: one man, one vote! With the College, this fundamental right has disappeared. Instead we have candidates that only campaign to a few voters and make extra promises to a few battleground states. Further, the College actually gives more power to voters in smaller states. It is absurd that in Minnesota there are 500,000 persons per electoral vote, while there are only 200,000 persons per electoral vote in the People's Republic of Vermont. Is it an outrage that the Chairman is only worth 2/5^ths as much as Howard Dean?

In a society where a farmer in Montana can text message his American Idol vote from his tractor, where a Walmart is in every village, and where people freely move across the country, a system that favors geography is outdated and should be eliminated.

on the other hand, the arguments for the Electoral College are the same as they were 200 years ago. We often forget that we live in the United States, not just one state. The College is essential for states rights. Without the College our elections would rarely have consensus. The College, however, always provides consensus because it takes a majority of Electors to win. Further, despite modernity, geography in the United States still matters. Without the College, the tyranny by the majority would become reality in presidential politics. Without the College, the voters in smaller rural states can be ignored because the votes are found in large population centers. Without the College slim majorities from just a few states would dominate the presidency.

The chairman, who never thought much of elections or college, has called for a debate to settle the question:

Resolved: Eliminate the electoral college

The Debate will be held on Wednesday, April 28, 2004 at the University Club, 420 Summit Avenue, in Saint Paul. The Chancellor will preside over drinks beginning at seven o'clock p.m. The debate will begin at half past seven. While there is no dress code for attendance, gentlemen who wish to speak must wear a tie; ladies should adhere to a similar sartorial standard. For those gentlemen who arrive tieless yet wish to speak, fret not: the Purveyor of Ties will keep on hand at least one of his quite remarkable ties for just such an eventuality. Questions about debate caucus procedures or about the John Adams Society itself may be directed to the Chairman at 952-546-3513 or the Secretary at (952) 937-7630.

If you would like to receive email announcements of upcoming debates, email the John Adams Society with your name, email address, and a simple statement requesting future "Whip Sheets" via email.